Wibowo, Sabrina Dewi Putri (2024) Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Merek Terdaftar "Puma dan Kucing Melompat" Atas Kesamaan Merek Terkenal Ditinjau Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis (Studi Putusan Nomor 16/Pdt.Sus-HKL/Merek/2023/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst). Awang Long Law Review, 6 (2). ISSN 2654-5462
01 JUDUL_240051_20416274201027_Sabrina Dewi Putri Wibowo.pdf
Download (589kB)
02 DAFTAR ISI_240051_20416274201027_Sabrina Dewi Putri Wibowo.pdf
Download (210kB)
03 ARTIKEL_240051_20416274201027_Sabrina Dewi Putri Wibowo.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (216kB)
04 DAFTAR PUSTAKA_240051_20416274201027_Sabrina Dewi Putri Wibowo.pdf
Download (39kB)
05 LAMPIRAN_240051_20416274201027_Sabrina Dewi Putri Wibowo.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (6MB)
Abstract
This research focuses on two important aspects: The research will delve deeply into laws related to well-known brands in Indonesia and the research will analyze specific cases that have been decided by the courts, such as case Number 16/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Brand/2023/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst.Well-known brands are usually highly valued because they spend money on advertising and promotion, and become more popular around the world. In addition, it obtains legal protection through trademark registration in different countries, which gives them exclusive rights to their trademarks and allows others to use them illegally. The Trademark Law in Indonesia provides special protection for well-known brands. However, trademark infringement still occurs in Indonesia. Normative juridical research, with legislation and case approaches on legal protection of well-known brands in Indonesia. Result: The Trademark Law provides a clear framework for the legal protection of well-known trademarks in Indonesia, both preventively and restrictively, in particular Article 21, Article 83 and Explanation of Article 76 paragraph (2). In decision Number 16/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Brand/2023/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst, the Commercial Court considered evidence showing that the Defendant deliberately took advantage of the reputation of the "PUMA and Jumping Cat" brand without permission or license. The Commercial Court decided to cancel the registration of the Defendant's trademark "PUMA and Jumping Cats" because the action infringed the Plaintiff's trademark rights. This decision was made to protect the Claimant from its legitimate trademark rights.
Keywords: Indonesia, Famous Brands, Legal Protection
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Law, Arts and Social Sciences > School of Law |
| Depositing User: | Pustakawan UBP Karawang |
| Date Deposited: | 31 Oct 2025 04:12 |
| Last Modified: | 31 Oct 2025 04:12 |
| URI: | http://repository.ubpkarawang.ac.id/id/eprint/4917 |
